Services

Forensic EMR services built for litigation

Every engagement is anchored to the record's audit trail and metadata — the data that establishes whether a medical record means what it appears to mean. Here's how I help attorneys put that evidence to work.

  • Audit trail & metadata analysis

    The core engagement. I analyze the EMR audit trail and underlying metadata to establish who did what to the record and when — surfacing late entries, backdating, deletions, copy-paste cloning, and edits made after the events the documentation describes.

    • Entry-timing reconstruction: when documentation was authored versus when events occurred
    • Edit, addendum, and deletion history
    • Copy-forward and cloned-content detection
    • User attribution and access correlation
  • Revision-history reconstruction

    Where a note exists in multiple states, I reconstruct its full revision history from the system's logs — distinguishing a disclosed, timestamped addendum from a silent alteration of the original, and showing the order in which content actually appeared.

    • Save-versus-sign timestamp analysis
    • Sequence reconstruction across versions
    • Identifying undisclosed post-finalization edits
  • Discovery support & model RFP language

    I draft request-for-production language tuned to the specific EMR so your discovery asks for what the system can actually produce — by function, not by an ambiguous label that invites a 'that report doesn't exist' objection.

    • System-specific RFP language for audit trails and access logs
    • Anticipating and countering 'too burdensome' and 'not a standard report' objections
    • Guidance on scoping patient, encounter, and date range
  • Deposition prep & expert consulting

    I prepare you to question custodians of record and IT witnesses, translate the technical findings into plain language, and consult through motion practice. Where appropriate, I can serve as a testifying or consulting expert.

    • Deposition outlines for records custodians and EMR administrators
    • Plain-language translation of technical findings
    • Consulting or testifying expert engagement
  • Audit trail vs. access log completeness review

    A focused review of what a provider actually produced. An access log shows who viewed the chart; an audit trail shows what changed. I identify which you received, what's missing, and exactly what to demand next.

    • Classifying produced data: access log vs. action audit
    • Gap analysis against the system's documented capabilities
    • A prioritized list of what to demand in the next request

Discovery language is tuned to the platform — see the system-specific discovery guides. Not sure which applies? Send the production you have and I'll tell you what the record can show.

Free case review

Have a case that turns on the medical record?

A free, no-obligation case review. Send the production you've received and I'll tell you what the audit trail can — and can't — show.